Legal Opinion

Gal v. Bishop

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1984No. 47371PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Linda Gal instituted this action for ejectment against defendants, Amos and Leona Bishop. Defendants counterclaimed for declaratory judgment asserting a right of possession based upon an admittedly oral agreement with plaintiff’s predecessors in title, Norris and Grace Fridley, under which defendants were given “the usage, possession and occupation” of the premises for their lifetimes. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment on her petition and on the counterclaim. Based upon the pleadings, interrogatories, and affidavits of the respective parties, the trial…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cherry v. City of Hayti HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Northeast Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Mercantile Trust Co. v. CarpMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Snowden v. Northwest Missouri State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Clevenger & Wright Co. v. A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Curnutt v. Scott Melvin Transport, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Ernst v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Landmark North County Bank & Trust Co. v. National Cable Training Centers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Missouri Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Bargfrede v. American Income Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API