Adams v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
A jury convicted Wilbert Ray Adams of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine. Appellant pleaded “true” to one enhancement paragraph and “untrue” to another enhancement paragraph. The jury found the enhancement paragraphs “true”1 and assessed punishment at twenty-five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. Appellant raises five points of error. We shall address these points out of order.
Point of error five challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s guilty verdict. Appellant cites no authority…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Medellin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Hurd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tamayo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
- David Browne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- David Ryan Campbell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2019