Legal Opinion
Sparkman v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 13, 1926No. 14284PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
The plaintiff below, opposing attorneys, and the issues are the same, and the evidence tendered by the defendants is in effect the same, as in the case of I. J. Gordon et al. v. W. T. Raw-leigh Co., No. 14285, this day decided, infra, p. 235. The opinion and syllabus in thp.t case are adopted as the opinion and syllabus in this case, and the judgment 'is affirmed.
Defendant in error in this case hrs asked for a judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond filed herein, in the event the judgment of the trial court should ■ be affirmed, it appearing that judgment…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. R. Kenneth Milburn and Jane B. Milburn, Husband and Wife and Bobby J. Rogers and Marilyn A. Rogers, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Maney v. CherrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Thomas v. BelcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LangelandWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Long v. FurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.