Legal Opinion

Grubb Co. v. Department of Real Estate

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 2011No. A125875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.—

I

INTRODUCTION

An employee of appellant The Grubb Company, Inc. (Grubb), a licensed real estate brokerage firm, represented both parties in negotiations for the sale of a residence. The sale fell through, and the sellers, against Grubb’s advice, declined to return the buyers’ deposit. The buyers sued Grubb, several of its employees, and the sellers. The jury found that Grubb and one of its employees had made misrepresentations and breached their fiduciary duty. The jury also found, however, that the buyers had not shown by clear and convincing evidence that Grubb or its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. In re KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wimsatt v. Beverly Hills Weight Loss Clinics International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Griffiths v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Ryan-Lanigan v. Bureau of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API