Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Cameron Kincade
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 2, 2003No. 02-50380PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
Each leap forward in forensic science promises ever more efficient and swift resolution of criminal investigations. At the same time, technological advances frequently raise new constitutional concerns and threaten our basic liberties.1 Here, we confront the challenge compulsory DNA collection poses to one of the most fundamental and traditional preserves of individual privacy, the human body.
We decide, in this case of first impression, whether the forced extraction of blood from parolees pursuant to the…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Norman C. Green, Jr., Donald Lee, Glenn Turner, and Dennis E. Jones-El v. Gerald A. Berge and James E. Doyle, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Brandon Michael LifshitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Karen H. Amerson, United States of America v. Julius GravesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Groceman v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.