Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Washington

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 2005No. 2-04-408-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

After the trial court granted Appellant’s motion for mistrial, Appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus alleging further prosecution was barred by double jeopardy. The trial court granted the writ, held a hearing, and denied the relief sought by Appellant. In three issues, Appellant claims the witnesses’ testimony that triggered the granting of the mistrial was attributable to the State because the mens rea of the witnesses in violating the court’s motion in limine is imputed to the prosecution, and the improper statements of the witnesses raise…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bauder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. GravelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Ex Parte CastellanoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. State v. HopsonWashington Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  2. State v. TraylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Gallemore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. State v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Kelvin Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API