Educational Testing Service v. Simon
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
CONSUELO BLAND MARSHALL, District Judge.
Based on the submission of the parties relating to Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the Court hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
A. FINDINGS OF FACT
1.Plaintiff ETS is a nonprofit educational corporation, chartered under New York law, that develops and administers standardized tests, including the MSAT. Declaration of Charlotte Solomon, attached to Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Injunction (“Original Solomon Decl.”), ¶ 2.
2. The MSAT is a two-part…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chicago Board of Education v. Substance, Inc. And George N. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- RDF Media Ltd. v. Fox Broadcasting Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Stewart v. WachowskiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Harris v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.