Legal Opinion
E.M. v. Los Angeles Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 20, 2011No. B221206PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant E.M. (plaintiff), who was sexually molested by a basketball coach, appeals an order dismissing her tort action against defendants and respondents Los Angeles Unified School District (the District), and Andre LaBeach (LaBeach), Andre Chevalier and Michelle Chevalier in their capacity as employees and/or agents of the District (sometimes collectively referred to as the District).
The essential issue presented is whether plaintiff duly filed a government claim prior to filing suit against the District.
We conclude plaintiff satisfied the claim…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.California Supreme Court · 2017
- J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Marr. of LinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014