Legal Opinion

Donnerberg v. Oppenheimer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1896No. 2209PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.— Hon. Norman Buck, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

One Winnie executed a note to Solomon Oppenheimer, and said Oppenheimer and E. J. Brickell guaranteed the payment of the note, waiving demand, protest, etc., by a written guaranty upon the back thereof, and Oppenheimer, before the maturity, sold the note to one Dekum, and it was thereafter transferred.several times and was finally purchased by the plaintiff, who brought this action upon the guaranty against the representatives of said guarantors, they both having died, to collect a balance due upon the note.

There is no controversy as to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Crosby v. RoubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Robinson v. LairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  4. Davis v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Darby v. Berney National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hendrix v. Bauhard Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Brownfield v. HollandWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Cady v. Bay City Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Mangold & Glandt Bank v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API