Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Carlsbad Sanatorium Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1913PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. This is an action by W. B. McFarland against the Carlsbad Hot Springs Sanatorium Company, a corporation, Edgar H. Thornton, J. K. Locke, Ernest Sommer, F. E. Foster, Oliver Gallup, J. F. Monte, J. W. Bruce, Geo. Woodnorth and F. A. Clark. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, all the defendants appeal, except F. A. Clark. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey

1. The defendant, the Carlsbad Hot Springs Sanatorium Company, is a corporation. The plaintiff, about March 22, 1911, purchased of the defendant company $2,000 in stock of said company, and paid said defendant company therefor $2,000. This company was incorporated to build, equip and conduct a sanatorium at certain hot springs about two miles east of North Powder in Baker County, Oregon.

*532The complaint charges that the plaintiff was induced to buy said stock by false and fraudulent representations made by the defendants. The complaint is couched in turgid rhetoric, rarely equaled in judicial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cawston v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Anderson v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Rolfes v. RusselOregon Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Bailey v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Wilde v. Oregon Trust & Savings BankOregon Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. United States Nat. Bank of Oregon v. FoughtOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Christofferson v. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Mount v. WelshOregon Supreme Court · 1926

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API