Legal Opinion

Rolfes v. Russel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1875PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Prim:, J.:

This is an action by a vendee against a vendor, to recover damages for false representations as to the character, quality and boundaries of a certain piece of land sold by appellants to respondent.

It is alleged in the complaint, that defendants represented the westerly line of the land sold, as extending from the bank of the Columbia Biver back to the bills, and running in a straight line with Booster Bock and two certain trees, represented as witness trees; that a large quantity of high dry land would be included within said boundaries, and that a piece of improved…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Marsh v. FalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Oberlander v. . SpiessNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Lord v. GoddardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Wilcox v. Iowa Wesleyan UniversitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States Nat. Bank of Oregon v. FoughtOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Cawston v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Anderson v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Archambeau v. EdmunsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. McFarland v. Carlsbad Sanatorium Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API