Legal Opinion
Cynthia M. Dore v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 17, 2019No. 18-cv-950-PBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Cynthia M. Dore v. Case No. 18-cv-950-PB Opinion No.
2019 DNH 154
Andrew Saul, Commissioner Social Security Administration MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Cynthia Dore challenges the denial of her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). She contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) improperly evaluated medical opinions in her record. The Commissioner, in turn, moves for an order affirming the ALJ’s decision. I deny Dore’s motion and affirm the Commissioner’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Ward v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deana Rose Discordia v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
- Discordia v. US Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
- Dore v. US Social Security Administration, Acting CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019