Legal Opinion
Deana Rose Discordia v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 1, 2021No. 19-cv-1261-PBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Deana Rose Discordia v. Case No. 19-cv-1261-PB Opinion No.
2021 DNH 028
Andrew Saul, Commissioner Social Security Administration MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Deana Rose Discordia challenges the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). She contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) committed reversible errors by failing to consider the diagnoses and opinions of her treating and examining physicians, failing to give appropriate weight to her own testimony, and failing to review the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Ward v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eric Douthitt v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
- Discordia v. US Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
- Douthitt v. US Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021