Legal Opinion

United States v. Peroceski

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 28, 2008No. 07-1336PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Timothy Peroceski pleaded guilty to possessing 50 or more grams of methamphetamine with intent to distribute it. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1). In calculating Mr. Peroceski’s sentence, the district court 1 applied a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l) for possessing a dangerous weapon in connection with a drug crime. Mr. Peroceski appeals his sentence and we affirm.

Mr. Peroceski did not dispute any of the facts in the pre-sentence report (PSR) that was prepared for his case, leading the district court to adopt them in their entirety. The PSR recounts…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Kenneth Joseph HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Diego RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Eddie Louis DentonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Gary O. FladtenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. CananiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. San-MiguelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Raymond NapolitanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API