Legal Opinion

United States v. Gary O. Fladten

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 24, 2000No. 00-1422PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Per curiam

Gary Fladten was charged with attempting to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 841(b)(1)(A). He pled guilty, but reserved his right to appeal on the ground that the district court 1 erroneously failed to suppress evidence gained from a war-rantless search of an automobile. Fladten also appeals his sentence relating to the district court’s two-level enhancement for the possession of a weapon. We affirm the district court’s ruling on both issues.

I

On November 12, 1996, responding to neighborhood complaints, agents of the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Kansas…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. Donald E. McCracken Ii, United States of America v. Donald E. McCracken IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Keehn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. United States v. Brown, RockyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Damien WellsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Joel Gerard Ameling Tina BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Billy Ray RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API