Legal Opinion

Stearns v. Beard

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

Decided May 11, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.

This is an equity action of infringement, based upon letters patent No. 16,031, granted to the complainant April 7, 1885, for a design for the casing of a hay-fork pulley. The claim is as follows:

*194“The design for the easing of a hay-fork puiiey, consisting of; Je plates, o, haying a ring, 6, and hubs, d, central ribs, e, laterally-projecting ears,/, and marginal beads, g, substantially as shown and described.”

The defense is lack of patentable novelty. Infringement is conclusively proved. Pulley-casings, of course, were old. A pulley cannot operate without the casing. The record shows many…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perry v. StarrettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James E. Tompkins Co. v. New York Woven Wire Mattress Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API