Legal Opinion

Chahine v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1990No. A044582PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, J.

Oscar Chahine appeals from a judgment in favor of the State Board of Equalization (the Board) on his suit for a refund of sales and use taxes. He claims primarily that he was denied due process of law, that the judgment is not supported by substantial evidence, that the court made certain evidentiary errors in admitting testimony at trial, and that the court erred when it held certain portions of his claim for a refund were untimely. We find appellant’s arguments without merit and affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Appellant and his wife were the sole shareholders…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Southern California Edison Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. A & M RECORDS, INC. v. State Bd. of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Koy LengCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Masi v. NagleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API