Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Randall v. Shain

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 26, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Respondents insist that the writ of certiorari issued in this case should be dismissed because relators failed to comply with rules 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this court, in that relators failed to serve respondent, or file with the clerk of this court a complete abstract of the record in the time required by the said rules. The case was set for hearing on September 9, 1936. A motion to dismiss was filed by respondents for failure to comply with the rules above mentioned. Thereafter, and before the date set for the hearing, relators filed a motion asking that the case be continued to the January…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ohio Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Heinbach v. HeinbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  3. Waterman v. Chicago Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Schulz v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Russell v. Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lawson v. LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Pierce v. New York R. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. FineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Modlin v. Sun Mark, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. McCoy v. Easley Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API