Legal Opinion

Stroud v. United States

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 1, 1995No. Civ. A. 2:94-2546-18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORTON, District Judge.

This action is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs brought this tax refund action and assert that they are entitled to deduct as business losses certain payments to the United States which arose because Plaintiff Nancy Stroud refused to perform her professional service commitment under the National Health Services Corps Scholarship Program. For the reasons stated below, this court denies Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

I. FACTS

In 1978, the National Health Services Corps (NHSC)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Starnes v. United States (In Re Starnes)District Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
  2. Boral Gas of American Samoa, Inc. v. IaulualoHigh Court of American Samoa · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API