Legal Opinion
Town of Iva Ex Rel. Zoning Administrator v. Holley
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided June 21, 2007No. 4262PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoolsby, J.
Annette Holley and Anne Holley-Barnes (collectively the Holleys) appeal an order in which the master-in-equity found the enforcement of a zoning ordinance against them did not violate the Equal Protection Clause. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1986, the Town of Iva (the Town) adopted a zoning ordinance that included an “RS” classification intended to provide “homogeneous and aesthetically harmonious development of single-family dwellings on lots having an area of 10,000 square feet or more.” One permitted use in the RS area was “[d]etached single-family dwellings, excluding mobile homes.” After enactment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harbit v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Olson v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Olson v. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND ENV.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Robarge v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009