Worth v. Civil Service Commission
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentSteele Hays, Justice
The majority is applying Bradley v. Bruce, 288 Ark. 342, 705 S.W.2d 431 (1986), retroactively, which I think is a mistake. Nothing in Bradley v. Bruce suggests that retroactive application was intended and we do not, as a rule, adopt that course. Wiles v. Wiles, 289 Ark. 340, 711 S.W.2d 789 (1986);Solem v. Stumes, 465 U.S. 638 (1984); Cunningham v. State, 251 Ark. 277, 471 S.W.2d 777 (1971); Gross v. State, 246 Ark. 909, 440 S.W.2d 543 (1969); Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239, 429 S.W.2d 245 (1968); Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp., 220 Ark. 601, 249 S.W.2d 973 (1952); Great Northern…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parish v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Dahl v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.