Legal Opinion
Houts Law PLLC v. Amsterdam Printing & Litho Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 10, 2026No. 5:25-cv-01325Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA HOUTS LAW PLLC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-1325-R ) AMSTERDAM PRINTING & LITHO ) INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Amsterdam Printing & Litho Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 8] Plaintiff Houts Law PLLC’s Complaint1 [Doc. No. 1-1]. Plaintiff filed a Response [Doc. No. 11], Defendant Replied [Doc. No. 16], and Plaintiff filed a Sur- Reply [Doc. No. 19]. The matter is now at issue. BACKGROUND2 The facts as alleged are as follows: Defendant mailed an Order Form for custom- printed pens to Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Robert Ray Mhoon, Takura Fujiwara, and Melinda Isabel FujiwaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.