Legal Opinion

Perri v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 29, 1996No. 95-359CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDEWELT, Judge.

I

In this action, plaintiff, Anthony Perri, also known as Anthony Marino, seeks to recover $1.4 million from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for assistance plaintiff provided FBI agents in accumulating evidence regarding a money laundering scheme. In his amended complaint, plaintiff claims that an FBI agent assigned to the Organized Crime Task Force recruited plaintiff to participate in a sting operation directed at two individuals with organized crime connections. The FBI sought to accumulate the evidence necessary to indict the two individuals for violations…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  5. City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Confidential Informant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Perri v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Warr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API