State v. Driscoll
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Michelle Driscoll appealed from an order denying a motion to suppress evidence, a criminal judgment and cpmmitment, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, all of which arise from drug-related charges brought against her. We affirm the district court’s orders and the criminal judgment and commitment.
[¶ 2] A confidential informant (“Cl”) worked with Fargo Police to buy cocaine and methamphetamine from an individual named Williams. During two separate drug buys, Williams met the Cl at a Fargo location to arrange the drug purchase and obtain money from the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HidanovicNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MoosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Interest of D.O.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Miller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008