Legal Opinion

State v. Driscoll

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2005No. 20040292PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Michelle Driscoll appealed from an order denying a motion to suppress evidence, a criminal judgment and cpmmitment, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, all of which arise from drug-related charges brought against her. We affirm the district court’s orders and the criminal judgment and commitment.

[¶ 2] A confidential informant (“Cl”) worked with Fargo Police to buy cocaine and methamphetamine from an individual named Williams. During two separate drug buys, Williams met the Cl at a Fargo location to arrange the drug purchase and obtain money from the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HidanovicNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MoosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Interest of D.O.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Miller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API