Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McBurney

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1978No. [Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 6, September Term, 1977.]PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In this disciplinary action we conclude that the three-judge panel erred in excluding from their consideration a charge that the attorney violated certain disciplinary rules. Thus, we shall remand the case to the. panel in order that they may make a determination as to whether he did or did not violate those rules.

John J. McBurney (McBurney) was admitted to the Bar of this Court on June 27, 1961. He was admitted to practice in the District of Columbia in 1953. Bar Counsel filed a petition with us on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission alleging that McBurney violated those portions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Bar Ass'n v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AndresenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BreschiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. LevitskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API