Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1975No. Appeals, Nos. 1252, 1259 and 1273 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

We have for our consideration three related appeals from two final orders of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) approving applications and granting certificates of public convenience and necessity to The Potomac Edison Company (Potomac) for the right to proceed in eminent domain for an electric transmission line right-of-way across the Franklin County properties of George H. Barmont and Mildred R. Barmont (Barmont) and of Harold D. McCoy and Catherine M. McCoy (McCoy). The Barmont and McCoy properties are contiguous. Consolidated hearings were held…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Payne v. KassabCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Schenck v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Commonwealth v. National Gettysburg Battlefield Tower, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. National Gettysburg Battlefield Tower, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Community College v. FoxCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Energy Conservation Council v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Lehigh Valley Transportation Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. Precision Tube Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API