Legal Opinion

State v. Worsham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 2017No. 4D15-2733PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

The state challenges an order granting appellee Charles Worsham’s motion to suppress. Without a warrant, the police downloaded data from the “event data recorder” or “black box” located in Wors-ham’s impounded vehicle. We affirm, concluding there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in the information retained by an event data recorder and downloading that information without a warrant from an impounded car in the absence of exigent circumstances violated the Fourth Amendment.

Worsham was the driver of a vehicle involved in a high speed accident that killed his passenger. The vehicle was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MOBLEY v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API