Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re: J.A.M.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 2018No. COA16-563-2Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

The majority's opinion concludes the trial court's findings support the trial court's conclusion that J.A.M. was neglected. I disagree and respectfully dissent.

I. Definition of Neglect

North Carolina statutes and precedents have consistently required departments of social services to prove by clear and convincing competent evidence that "there be some physical, mental or emotional impairment of the juvenile or substantial risk of such impairment as a consequence of the [parent's] failure to provide 'proper care, supervision, or discipline.' " In re Safriet , 112 N.C. App. 747, 752, 436 S.E.2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. In Re McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. In Re StumboSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. In re E.N.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API