Legal Opinion

Dougherty v. Dougherty

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1992No. 17506PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice'.'

William Dougherty (husband) appeals from trial court’s judgment that proceeds he obtained from a sale of property were subject to division pursuant to the divorce decree. We reverse and remand.

*321FACTS

Effie Dougherty (wife) and husband were divorced in Tripp County in 1983. They were joint tenancy owners of approximately 2,480 acres of predominantly farm and ranch property in Tripp County. The divorce decree required the parties to use their best efforts to sell the property, then use the proceeds to satisfy a mortgage to Farmers Home Administration (FmHA), pay real estate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sharp v. SharpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Temple v. TempleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Board of Regents v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bunkers v. JacobsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Taecker v. TaeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Zarecky v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. B.M. (H.) T. v. J.D.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API