Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Falco Construction Corp. v. Summit General Contracting Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 21, 1991No. 89-CV-2931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
BARTELS, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
In this Miller Act1 case Falco Construction Corporation (“Falco”), the use plaintiff and subcontractor, seeks to recover monetary damages from Summit General Contracting Corporation (“Summit”), the general contractor, and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Summit’s surety on its payment bond (jointly, the “defendants”). Fal-co commenced this action after Summit failed to pay $97,515.00, monies Falco alleged it was owed for services Falco rendered Summit pursuant to a written proposal (the “proposal” or “sub-contract”) to drive test and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Slatt v. SlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- T. C. V'soske, S. T. V'soske, K. A. V'soske, George A. Spater and V'soske Shops, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick and E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Zev v. MermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tantleff v. TruscelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dreni v. PrinterOn America CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- US for Use of Falco Const. v. Summit Gen. Contr.District Court, E.D. New York · 1991