Legal Opinion
US for Use of Falco Const. v. Summit Gen. Contr.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 21, 1991No. 89-CV-2931Published
1Opinion of the Court
760 F.Supp. 1004 (1991)
UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of FALCO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
v.
SUMMIT GENERAL CONTRACTING CORPORATION and The Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, Defendants.
No. 89-CV-2931.
United States District Court, E.D. New York.
March 21, 1991.
Birnbaum & Birnbaum, Mineola, N.Y. (Harris Birnbaum, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Thomas Welby, White Plains, N.Y., for defendant Summit General Contracting Corp.
Hart & Hume, New York City (Eugene F. Brady, of counsel), for defendant Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
BARTELS, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
In…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Slatt v. SlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- T. C. V'soske, S. T. V'soske, K. A. V'soske, George A. Spater and V'soske Shops, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick and E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Zev v. MermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tantleff v. TruscelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.