Legal Opinion

McNeilus Companies, Inc. v. Sams

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 16, 1997No. 05-97-00900-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

Pursuant to a contractual covenant not to compete, appellants McNeilus Companies, Inc. and McNeilus Financial, Inc. d/b/a McNeilus Truck and Manufacturing Co. 1 seek to enjoin their former employee, appel-lee George Preston Sams, from working for a McNeilus competitor. Finding that the non-competition agreement was unreasonably broad, the trial court denied McNeilus’s application for a temporary injunction. This interlocutory appeal followed. McNeilus asserts two points of error. First, McNeilus contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Recon Exploration, Inc. v. Hodges, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. v. Wurzman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  5. Tom James Co. v. MendropCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cardinal Health Staffing Network, Inc. v. Bowen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  3. BAY FINANCIAL SAVINGS BANK, FSB v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. TransPerfect Translations, Inc. v. LeslieDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  5. McKissock, LLC v. MartinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API