McNeilus Companies, Inc. v. Sams
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAGARDE, Justice.
Pursuant to a contractual covenant not to compete, appellants McNeilus Companies, Inc. and McNeilus Financial, Inc. d/b/a McNeilus Truck and Manufacturing Co. 1 seek to enjoin their former employee, appel-lee George Preston Sams, from working for a McNeilus competitor. Finding that the non-competition agreement was unreasonably broad, the trial court denied McNeilus’s application for a temporary injunction. This interlocutory appeal followed. McNeilus asserts two points of error. First, McNeilus contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Recon Exploration, Inc. v. Hodges, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. v. Wurzman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Tom James Co. v. MendropCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cardinal Health Staffing Network, Inc. v. Bowen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- BAY FINANCIAL SAVINGS BANK, FSB v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- TransPerfect Translations, Inc. v. LeslieDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- McKissock, LLC v. MartinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.