Legal Opinion

Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. v. Wurzman

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 21, 1993No. 05-93-00223-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

HRH appeals the trial court’s partial denial of its application for a temporary injunction. HRH sued Wurzman to enforce the confidentiality and noncompetition terms of HRH’s employment agreement with Wurz-man. HRH contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying its request for a temporary injunction and in reaching certain findings of fact and conclusions of law. Wurzman asserts a cross point, claiming the trial court erred in reaching a certain finding of fact and conclusion of law. We affirm the trial court’s order.

THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES

HRH is the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Iranian Muslim Organization v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Butler v. Arrow Mirror & Glass, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  2. Tom James of Dallas, Inc. v. Cobb, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  3. Cardinal Health Staffing Network, Inc. v. Bowen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  4. EMSL Analytical, Inc. v. Younker, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Loye v. Travelhost, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API