Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. v. Wurzman
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Justice.
HRH appeals the trial court’s partial denial of its application for a temporary injunction. HRH sued Wurzman to enforce the confidentiality and noncompetition terms of HRH’s employment agreement with Wurz-man. HRH contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying its request for a temporary injunction and in reaching certain findings of fact and conclusions of law. Wurzman asserts a cross point, claiming the trial court erred in reaching a certain finding of fact and conclusion of law. We affirm the trial court’s order.
THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES
HRH is the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Iranian Muslim Organization v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Butler v. Arrow Mirror & Glass, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- Tom James of Dallas, Inc. v. Cobb, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Cardinal Health Staffing Network, Inc. v. Bowen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- EMSL Analytical, Inc. v. Younker, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Loye v. Travelhost, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.