Legal Opinion
Florentina Cardoso Aurora Moran Arturo Martinez v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 11, 2000No. 99-10316PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants brought this action for injunctive and declaratory relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and section 301 of the Immigration Act of 1990. They seek to compel the Attorney General to adjust their immigration status, permit them to remain in the United States, and provide them with work authorization. The district court dismissed the action, finding that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) deprived it of jurisdiction to review the action. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
Appellants, Florentina Cardoso, Arturo Martinez, and Aurora Moran are citizens of Mexico.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Reynaldo Requena-Rodriguez v. Kenneth Pasquarell, Immigration & Naturalization Service, District DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Zadvydas v. UnderdownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- The John G. And Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation v. Garry Mauro, Commissioner of the General Land OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Paunescu v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- RANDALL D. WOLCOTT, MD, PA v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Patel v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Pinho v. Atty Gen USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Mushtaq Ahmed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Ruben Gomez-Chavez v. Brian Perryman, District Director, and Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.