Legal Opinion
Paunescu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 2, 1999No. 98 C 5971PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
On September 23,1998, plaintiffs Teodor and Lelia Paunescu filed a complaint for mandamus and declaratory judgment against the Immigration & Naturalization Service, District Director Brian Perryman and the United States of America seeking to compel defendants to immediately issue all appropriate documents and take all appropriate action to execute and process plaintiffs’ applications under the 1998 Diversity Immigrant Visa Program, and to grant plaintiffs legal permanent residence through an adjustment of status. The parties have filed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PangilinanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Yue Yu v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
- Alexander Blaney v. United States of America, United States Air Force, Lin BartuccaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Alvidres-Reyes v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Hakim Iddir v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Charles Kibaara Nyaga, Doin Kainyu Kibaara v. Joh Ashcroft, Rosemary MelvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Florentina Cardoso Aurora Moran Arturo Martinez v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Hamed Almaqrami v. Michael PompeoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Salvatore Coraggioso v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.