Legal Opinion
Boozier v. Hambrick
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided January 28, 1993No. 01-92-00730-CVPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MIRABAL, Justice.
Appellant Mary Boozier, an employee of the City of Houston, appeals pursuant to Tex.Civ.PRac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(5) from the trial court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment 1 in a case brought against her for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and tortious interference with contract. We reverse and render.
The following facts are undisputed. Boozier is an airport police officer at Hobby Airport. Hambrick is a superintendent at Hobby Airport and, like Boozier, is employed by the City of Houston.
Boozier reported to her superiors that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Scurlock Oil Co. v. SmithwickTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Bagg v. University of Texas Medical Branch at GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Dallas County v. Gonzales, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- City of Hempstead v. Kmiec, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Camacho v. Samaniego, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
- Astoria Industries of Iowa, Inc. v. SNF, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.