Legal Opinion
Aramburu v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 14, 1995No. 93-4064-SACPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
On March 22, 1993, the plaintiff, Santiago Aramburu, commenced this action against his former employer, The Boeing Company (Boeing). Aramburu’s amended complaint seeks to recover damages and secure equitable relief to redress the deprivation of rights secured by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, Title I of the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), and the Kansas Act Against Discrimination. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have discriminated against him on the basis of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Griffith v. DavisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
- Dorato ex rel. Wrongful Death Claim of Tillison v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Bryant Woods Inn, Inc. v. Howard County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Rowlin v. Alabama Dep't of Public SafetyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.