Legal Opinion · Dissent

Paul v. Arnoult

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1927No. 9513Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY HIS HONOR

CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE

The fundamental error, I believe, of the majority opinion is in assuming that the notes sued on are community assets. The notes were given for the rent of a house and the house was the separate property of the wife. This makes the notes the separate property of the wife. C. C. 499. When and if, the notes are collected by the husband, the proceeds will then only fall into the community. But the wife has at any time the right to resume the administration of her notes and to sue upon them.

But assuming that the notes are community assets. When…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Franek v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. Holzab v. New Orleans & Carrollton RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
  4. Badie v. Columbia Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  5. Cade v. ReddittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API