Hurt v. Savona Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.
The question involved: Is the nonresident defendant, Savona Manufacturing Company, legally entitled under its removal petition to have this action transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina for trial by reason of the allegations of its petition that Lum Bruton and Will Fox, resident defendants, were joined as defendants fraudulently and for the purpose of depriving petitioner of its alleged right of removal? We think not.
This action is for actionable negligence. All the defendants are charged with a duty they owed to plaintiff and for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bunting v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Southern Railway Co. v. LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Lloyd v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trust Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Tolley v. W. M. Ritter Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Wright v. Bemis Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931