Legal Opinion

Bunting v. Oregon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 9, 1917No. 38PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

243 U.S. 426 (1917)

BUNTING

v.

STATE OF OREGON.

No. 38.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 18, 1916.

Restored for reargument June 12, 1916.

Reargued January 19, 1917.

Decided April 9, 1917.

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON.

Mr. W. Lair Thompson, with whom Mr. C.W. Fulton was on the briefs, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Felix Frankfurter, with whom Mr. George M. Brown, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, and Mr. J.O. Bailey, Assistant Attorney General of the State of Oregon, were on the briefs, for defendant in error.

Restored to docket for reargument June 12, 1916.

2Opinion of the Court · McKENNAJustice McKENNA

Indictment…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Bunting v. State of OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

4Cited by92 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API