Legal Opinion

Harris MacHinery Co. v. Heiner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1930No. 27,738PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or for a new trial.

Action to recover $301.57 and interest for balance claimed to be due for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered to defendant. The original claim was for $1,869.47, upon which there had been admittedly paid $1,567.90, leaving the amount sued for. Defendant in its answer disputed the correctness of plaintiff’s claim and counterclaimed, asserting breach of warranty with consequential damages and asking for judgment for $899.49 and interest. The jury returned a verdict in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Peoples State Bank v. RandbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API