Legal Opinion

Peoples State Bank v. Randby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 29, 1924No. 23,880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action by the payee against the maker of a promissory note for $375. Defense, that the note was given in payment of a part of the purchase price of a farm tractor; that the machine was warranted; that there was a breach of the warranty; and that, in consequence, the tractor is worthless. Verdict for defendant and plaintiff appeals from the denial of its blended motion for judgment or a new trial.

' Except as to the one issue with respect to which there must be a new trial, there is no occasion for examining the facts. That there *311was a warranty that the machine was suitable for and would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Melby v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Harris v. Simplex Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Benson v. Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Wyckoff v. HoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. DeRose v. Hunter Lindsay Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Harris MacHinery Co. v. HeinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API