Legal Opinion

Truncale v. Blumberg

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 21, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, District Judge.

The plaintiff has moved for summary judgment against defendant William A. Scully, and the situation as to him is similar to that of defendant Clifford Work, except that counsel for Work made a cross-motion for summary judgment, whereas counsel for Scully did not. There are no disputed questions of fact on the issue of the liability of any of defendants and the questions of law which govern the case are determined and set forth in my opinion dated October 14, 1948, D.C., 80 F.Supp. 387, in disposing of the companion motions relative to the claim against defendant J.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Truncale v. BlumbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  2. Hooker v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
  3. Pinkus v. ReillyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
  4. United States v. Erie CountyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Local 33, International Hod Carriers Building And Common Laborers' Union Of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mason Tenders District Council Of Greater New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Truncale v. BlumbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Truncale v. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. Local 33, International Hod Carriers Building & Common Laborers' Union v. Mason Tenders District CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API