Legal Opinion
Pinkus v. Reilly
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 4, 1947No. Civ. 5616PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, based on the ground that on the pleadings and exhibits filed herein, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and defendant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.
The action arises out of suit brought by the plaintiff, Joseph J. Pinkus, trading as American Health Aids Company and also as Energy Food Center, against Louis A. Reilly, as Postmaster of the City of Newark, to enjoin the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Leach v. CarlileSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Jarvis v. Shackelton Inhaler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Pinkus v. WalkerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reilly v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Pinkus v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Estate of CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Truncale v. BlumbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.