Legal Opinion

State v. Eubanks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1986No. 8629SC543PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

The only assignment of error defendant argues in his brief is that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction for second degree arson. Arson is defined at the common law as the willful and malicious burning of the dwelling house of another person. Under G.S. 14-58, if the dwelling burned was unoccupied at the time of the burning, the offense is arson in the second degree.

For a burning to be “willful and malicious” in the law of arson, it must simply be done voluntarily and without excuse or justification and without any bona fide claim of right. An intent or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. VickersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API