Legal Opinion

State v. English

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1989No. 8818SC1230Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant has brought forward three assignments of error, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the admission of evidence. We overrule two of defendant’s assignments of error, but find merit in one of them and accordingly award a new trial.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss. North Carolina retains the common law definition of arson. Hence, to establish arson, the State must prove a “willful and malicious burning of the dwelling of another person.” State v. Eubanks, 83 N.C. App. 338, 349 S.E.2d 884 (1986). Differing degrees…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API