Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Bruington
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 20, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
This is an accounting by the ancillary administrator. The decedent died a resident of New Jersey on November 4, 1932. He left no will and his estate passes by intestacy. He was the owner of two parcels of real property in New York county, 247 and 249 West One Hundred and Thirty-eighth street.
Objections to the account have been filed by the special guardian of four infants on the ground that the status of his wards as heirs and distributees has not been recognized by the accounting party. The special guardian contends that these children were legitimated under the law of New Jersey.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Olmsted v. OlmstedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hood v. McGeheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Miller v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Olmsted v. . OlmstedNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re the Accounting of VincentNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- In re the Accounting of GarretsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- "Castellani" v. "Castellani"New York Family Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of SimpsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of BurdakNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.