Legal Opinion

Pappas v. Harrah

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1922No. Docket No. 25PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Plaintiffs entered into contracts with defendant for the purchase of several lots, made substantial payments and then were in default. Defendant commenced, summary proceedings to obtain restitution of the premises. Judgments were rendered in the suits and under the statute plaintiffs had 80 days in which to redeem. During the period of redemption plaintiffs arranged with William B. Thompson to advance the money to pay the amounts due on the contracts and take deeds to his daughters. It is claimed defendant’s agents were notified of the fact that the money was available as soon as abstracts…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gordon Grossman Building Co. v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Flynn v KorneffelMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kaiser v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Karakas v. DostMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Nedelman v. MeiningerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API