Legal Opinion

Karakas v. Dost

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1976No. Docket 20663PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting defendant summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(1) and (3). We reverse.

Plaintiffs, James and Ruth Karakas, on July 5, 1972, borrowed $9,000 from defendants, Donald and Sara Dost. As security for the loan, plaintiffs deeded certain property to the Dosts and received, in exchange, a land contract due on or before six months from July 5, 1972. Because plaintiffs failed to pay the $9,000 on or before the due date, defendants Dost served plaintiffs with notice of forfeiture. Defendants Dost, in the district court for Tuscola County, obtained judgments for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Howell v. Vito's Trucking and Excavating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Borman's, Inc. v. Lake State Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flynn v KorneffelMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rinaldi v. RinaldiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Soloman v. Western Hills Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Bank of Commonwealth v. HuletteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API