Legal Opinion

Power Transmission Equipment Corp. v. Beloit Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1972No. 135PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The first question is whether Beloit has a lien on the forgings in its possession for the freight charges it paid. The trial court held Beloit had such a lien under sec. 289.44, Stats., 1 and we think the trial court was correct. Power Transmission contends this section does not apply: (1) Because the forgings were mistakenly delivered, and (2) they were not delivered on consignment for sale. We accept the findings of the trial court that the forgings involved were those delivered in July of 1969, and not those mistakenly delivered in September, 1969. True, the forgings were delivered for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Jackson Vinegar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Pierce Oil Corp. v. Phoenix Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bank of Am., N.A. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  2. West v. Whitney-Fidalgo Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Frost-Pack Distributing Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Aircraft Repair Services General Mediterranean Aviation Services v. Stambaugh's Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc. v. GahaganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API